NLRB Releases Final Rule on Joint Employment
Many employers contract with PEO companies to outsource their payroll and other administrative duties. Those companies may go so far as to assist in hiring and firing, in addition to running payroll and providing benefits. As a result, in employment litigation, the question can often become: who exactly employed the individual? The company? The PEO? Both?
The answer may not be as obvious as you may think. Whether PEOs and other “secondary” entities should be held responsible for the unlawful actions of the business the employee dealt with day-to-day has been a subject of debate in the legal community for decades. Technically, the term is “joint employment.”
While courts have endeavored to provide guidance as to what exactly makes two entities “joint employers,” the results are not consistent from location-to-location. But today, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) approved a Final Rule on what makes a “joint employment” relationship, providing some clarity and uniformity to the joint-employment analysis. In discussing the new rule, it stated:
The proposed rule provided an illustrative, rather than exclusive, list of essential terms and conditions of employment. The Board has modified this definition, for the reasons discussed below and in response to comments, to provide an exhaustive list of seven categories of terms or conditions of employment that will be considered “essential” for the purposes of the jointemployer inquiry. These are: (1) wages, benefits, and other compensation; (2) hours of work and scheduling; (3) the assignment of duties to be performed; (4) the supervision of the performance of duties; (5) work rules and directions governing the manner, means, and methods of the performance of duties and the grounds for discipline; (6) the tenure of employment, including hiring and discharge; and (7) working conditions related to the safety and health of employees.
The link to the Rule is here.
Technically, the standards only apply to cases involving the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), a law which, generally speaking, addresses unions in the private sector. Nevertheless, this Rule will no doubt prove highly influential in other areas of employment law, as well.
TLDR: Your employer may be more than just the company for whom you perform work. And, bonus content: under the NLRA it’s also unlawful for employers to tell you not to talk about your wages with your co-workers. The more you know!
A change of plans...
Plans have changed. Today is not a day for celebrations. Today is a black day. Today we mourn.
“With sorrow—for this Court, but more, for the many millions of American women who have today lost a fundamental constitutional protection—we dissent.” — Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. ____ (2022)(Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, J.J., dissenting).
Read moreSincerely Held Religious Beliefs and COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates
I have had many inquiries over the last few weeks from people who are being forced to choose between getting the COVID-19 vaccine and losing their jobs. Before you schedule a consultation with me, take a moment to read this blog. You may find your question is answered in it.
Read moreStrike that, Reverse it: DeSantis Remains able to Penalize Schools with Mask Mandates
Not a picture of me, but fairly representative of my feelings on the subject.
It seems like only yesterday I was blogging about Judge Cooper lifting the stay that would have allowed Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to continue to withhold funds from school districts that enforced mask mandates without parental exception while the appeal was pending. Alas, that was almost 48 hours ago, and the times have changed. The First District Court of Appeal has issued an Order today reinstating the stay, citing concerns over jurisdiction and standing.
Read moreBreaking News: Governor Can't Enforce School Mask Penalty while Appeal Pending
In a breathtaking act of defiance of the rule of law, the school funding was cut on Monday, August, 30, 2021—3 days before the official written judgment was handed down—in spite of the oral decision of the court on August 27, 2021. Today’s order will stop that from happening again while the appeal is pending.
Read moreAll about the Hamiltons, as of 9/30/21
By US Government - United States Treasury Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=567559
Florida’s new minimum wage rate takes effect 9/30/21.
Read moreFlorida Doubles-Down on Vaccine "Passport" Penalties
The State of Florida is doubling-down on its position that it has the right to tell not only public entities, but private entities, how to conduct business by hitting them with a $5,000 per violation fine. The DOH would penalize schools for requiring proof of a COVID-19 vaccine to provide services. The enforcement of this Rule flies in the face of longstanding law on the issue of school-entry vaccine requirements, creating a bizarre and politically-motivated carve-out for COVID-19. Litigation is likely—and I know who my money is on.
Read moreBalancing the Interests: From Schools to Workplaces
This balancing of interests is very likely to be a point of discussion in the near future as employers begin to mandate masks and vaccines. Clues about how that balancing might go may be found in today’s decision on the mandatory school mask and funding-cut issue.
Read moreAnchors Aweigh! Federal Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in Favor of NCL
Image Courtesy of NCL.
A federal judge has ordered that Florida’s recently-passed law prohibiting businesses from requiring proof of vaccination of their customers cannot be enforced, granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Ltd.
Read more